<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>waded.org &#187; AJAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waded.org/tag/ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waded.org</link>
	<description>Wade Dorrell’s tech + arts blog from Boise, Idaho</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ajax is still iffy</title>
		<link>http://www.waded.org/2008/05/01/ajax-is-still-iffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waded.org/2008/05/01/ajax-is-still-iffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waded.org/archives/ajax-is-still-iffy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Jakob Nielson did not actually say a few years ago ago, followed up on from the accessibility angle by the Sibling Of Cake at Opera.&#160; I wonder how this article came about&#8230; Opera has great JavaScript performance, but I wonder how Opera Mobile/Mini handle it? In my experience mobile browser users (me) suffer from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.usabilityviews.com/ajaxsucks.html">What Jakob Nielson did not actually say a few years ago ago</a>, followed up on <a href="http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/stop-using-ajax/">from the accessibility angle by the Sibling Of Cake at Opera.</a>&#160;</p>
<p>I wonder how this article came about&#8230; Opera has great JavaScript performance, but I wonder how Opera Mobile/Mini handle it? In my experience mobile browser users (me) suffer from some of the same issues that&#8217;d be dismissed as only accessibility issues for desktop users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waded.org/2008/05/01/ajax-is-still-iffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ajax may actually suck</title>
		<link>http://www.waded.org/2005/12/07/why-ajax-actually-may-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waded.org/2005/12/07/why-ajax-actually-may-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 05:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waded.org/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Ajax Sucks fooled me, a few Forest Service folks, and probably the rest of the internet tomorrow: So Jakob Nielsen doesn&#8217;t like Ajax. Here&#8217;s a serious rebuttal, followed up with the truth: Jakob Nielsen thinks most things suck, and his articles make good templates. But Ajax may actually suck! I actually like Ajax, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.usabilityviews.com/ajaxsucks.html">Why Ajax Sucks</a> fooled me, a few Forest Service folks, and probably the rest of the internet tomorrow: So Jakob Nielsen doesn&#8217;t like Ajax.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/2005/12/jakob_nielsen_w.html">serious rebuttal</a>, followed up with the truth: Jakob Nielsen thinks most things suck, and his articles make good templates.</p>
<p>But Ajax may actually suck! I actually like Ajax, but I&#8217;ll try to be spoofer&#8217;s-advocate for the moment.</p>
<p>The unit of the internet <strong>is</strong> the page. Addressibility of a page is coming on strong in social web systems. We talk about it a lot at ProClarity too. A URL points at something to look at and to talk about. If what&#8217;s &#8220;at&#8221; the URL depends on people, or things, diddling with dynamic widgets on the &#8220;page&#8221; first, that&#8217;s a problem for those systems, because what&#8217;s being talked about is an entry point, not anything that interesting.</p>
<p>You certainly <strong>can</strong> solve this, and it&#8217;s not Ajax&#8217;s fault (the rebuttler rebutts), but will &#8220;the web is a VB form&#8221; programmers using Ajax bother to solve it? Sounds like work. Mmm, don&#8217;t like work. Ajax shiny.</p>
<p>I wonder how the Windows Presentation Framework navigation model deals with addressibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waded.org/2005/12/07/why-ajax-actually-may-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

