<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>waded.org &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waded.org/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waded.org</link>
	<description>Wade Dorrell’s tech + arts blog from Boise, Idaho</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Accidentally searching for inputs</title>
		<link>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waded.org/2009/09/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s amazing how search engines are wrapping some sites with a task-oriented interface that trumps the site’s own interface. The accident: I type “fedex.com” as “fedex.copm” into the Address bar by mistake, and hit Enter before I even see what I did. What happened: The search engine which handles the DNS lookup failure (bing.com on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It&#8217;s amazing how search engines are wrapping some sites with a task-oriented interface that trumps the site’s own interface. </p>
<p><strong>The accident: </strong>I type “<em>fedex.com</em>” as “<em>fedex.copm</em>” into the Address bar by mistake, and hit Enter before I even see what I did.</p>
<p><strong>What happened: </strong>The search engine which handles the DNS lookup failure (<em>bing.com</em> on my computer) provides a whole navigation layer on top of the “best match” (aka “most clicked”) result (which is <em>fedex.com, </em>obviously) including &quot;Track&quot;, but more importantly the input field I was going to look for when I got to FedEx, &quot;Track a package”:</p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Picture of Bing search result for fedex.copm" border="0" alt="Picture of Bing search result for fedex.copm" src="http://www.waded.org/wp-content/image12.png" width="510" height="298" /> </p>
<p>I see this, past in the tracking ID I had, and I’m done. Really slick.</p>
<p>I’ll call out Bing here once again: Bing’s fantastic &amp; you should use it as your default for this reason &amp; others.</p>
<p>Some thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do users really look beyond even the “Best Match” line and see &amp; use these tasks? I do, and it’s a huge timesaver.</li>
<li>Browsers will eventually (and I think in the case of Google Chrome, are) strip even the search page layer away. (Why not show the Track a package input field as an option when I type the&#160; &quot;fedex.cop…&quot; into the browser&#8217;s address bar?) Now, is it better for users that a browser do this, or the functionality stay in the resulting page?</li>
<li>If browser integration is better for users, what&#8217;s the existing or emerging standard for this that all browsers can implement?</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Fast Flip and Bing Visual Search: experimenting on users vs. utility</title>
		<link>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/15/google-fast-flip-and-bing-visual-search-experimenting-on-users-vs-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/15/google-fast-flip-and-bing-visual-search-experimenting-on-users-vs-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waded.org/2009/09/google-fast-flip-and-bing-visual-search-experimenting-on-users-vs-utility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s Fast Flip? It’s an experiment to see what live news content we’ll click through on when standing 20 feet away. Like a newsstand, without the ambiance. Could I get a copy of Giant Skyscraper Ad Quarterly, and some gum, please? &#160; Google Fast Flip: Which one of these blocks of text is not like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>What’s <a href="http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/">Fast Flip</a>? It’s an experiment to see what live news content we’ll click through on when standing 20 feet away. Like a newsstand, without the ambiance. Could I get a copy of Giant Skyscraper Ad Quarterly, and some gum, please?</p>
<p><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Google Fast Flip: Which one of these blocks of unreadable text is not like the other?" border="0" alt="Google Fast Flip: Which one of these blocks of unreadable text is not like the other?" src="http://www.waded.org/wp-content/image11.png" width="450" height="302" />&#160; <br /><em>Google Fast Flip: Which one of these blocks of text is not like the other?</em></p>
<p>Utility in Fast Flip’s hero scenario (<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/read-news-fast-with-google-fast-flip.html">described here</a>) is not in selecting, but in “flipping”    <br /> between news articles, which it does well enough, but with many missing affordances &amp; constraints (like not being able to view the whole article.) Flip needs to be browser functionality, not a web app. Maybe such functions will push into IE or Chrome at some point.</p>
<p>I think of Bing Visual Search as an experiment too, but it puts its filter &amp; decide utility right up front (<a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/09/14/visual-search-why-type-when-you-can-see-it.aspx">scenarios described on the Bing blog here</a>.)</p>
<p><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Bing Visual Search displaying top apps" border="0" alt="Bing Visual Search displaying top apps" src="http://www.waded.org/wp-content/image9.png" width="560" height="287" />&#160;&#160;&#160; <br />&#160;<em>Bing Visual Search lets users decide between top apps.</em></p>
<p>I imagine snapshots of news loaded into Bing Visual Search, and, vice versa, visual searches plugged into Fast Flip. Both would work, but Visual Search would be the sexier decision front end for <strong>either</strong>, especially if Bing worked with browser tabs (it doesn’t seem to at the moment) and with “DeepZoom” to handle resolution issues.</p>
<p>Speaking of sex, as the US wakes up the the results of the Fast Flip experiment are becoming clear… we click through on skin and scandal, no matter how far away it is:</p>
<p><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Pages showing skin and the word &#39;cheat&#39;" border="0" alt="Pages showing skin and the word &#39;cheat&#39;" src="http://www.waded.org/wp-content/image8.png" width="560" height="160" />&#160; <br /><em>This morning’s “Most Viewed” on Google Fast Flip</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/15/google-fast-flip-and-bing-visual-search-experimenting-on-users-vs-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

