What’s Fast Flip? It’s an experiment to see what live news content we’ll click through on when standing 20 feet away. Like a newsstand, without the ambiance. Could I get a copy of Giant Skyscraper Ad Quarterly, and some gum, please?

 
Google Fast Flip: Which one of these blocks of text is not like the other?

Utility in Fast Flip’s hero scenario (described here) is not in selecting, but in “flipping”
between news articles, which it does well enough, but with many missing affordances & constraints (like not being able to view the whole article.) Flip needs to be browser functionality, not a web app. Maybe such functions will push into IE or Chrome at some point.

I think of Bing Visual Search as an experiment too, but it puts its filter & decide utility right up front (scenarios described on the Bing blog here.)

   
 Bing Visual Search lets users decide between top apps.

I imagine snapshots of news loaded into Bing Visual Search, and, vice versa, visual searches plugged into Fast Flip. Both would work, but Visual Search would be the sexier decision front end for either, especially if Bing worked with browser tabs (it doesn’t seem to at the moment) and with “DeepZoom” to handle resolution issues.

Speaking of sex, as the US wakes up the the results of the Fast Flip experiment are becoming clear… we click through on skin and scandal, no matter how far away it is:

 
This morning’s “Most Viewed” on Google Fast Flip

In July I wrote about Google Voice’s inadequacy as a personal cell voicemail system: YouMail is a better solution for me on a number of points.

The biggest nail in the coffin are N+1 live phone numbers to use Google Voice, when YouMail works with N, and only 1 number will get callers to the Google Voice system. There’s no silver bullet here other than porting a current number, which I hear Google’s working on, but I expect several bullets will be needed (who know how carriers & regulators will accidentally collude to mess up Google’s aim.)

But I did some more digging, and found that for YouMail-equivalence (except for MP3 email delivery) you can use your current numbers with Google Voice & at least the Google Voicemail system until something better comes along. Here’s an honest-to-goodness, you-can-do-this-right-now, workaround:

• Don’t give anyone your Google Voice number! Yes, I know your new Google number is shiny. Just think, your number’s reclaimed from failed suburbia and still has that “partially finished subdivision” smell on it. It’ll help you cope.
• Turn on “Do Not Disturb” on your Google Voice account.
• Set your Google Voice number as your no-answer/busy transfer number for your other numbers.

Step 1 is easy, I won’t explain it any further.

Step 2: In the Google Voice web application, go to “Settings”, and under the “General” tab, enable “Do Not Disturb”:

This causes calls to your Google Voice number to go immediately to Google Voice voicemail, avoiding any audio disturbances, temporal displacements, or painful feedback loops.

Step 3:  On Verizon Wireless, I type *71 immediately followed by my (10-digit) Google Voice number, then hit send.  Wait for confirmation tone, then hang up. I believe the AT&T equivalent is  *61, but don’t blame me if that toasts your iPhone; I didn’t get a chance to test it. T-Mobile, Sprint, Cricket, and other carrier folks… you’re on your own. Help me out if you like.

In closing, this lets you get around lack of number portability for some scenarios, specifically replacing existing voicemail systems with Google Voice. Hopefully this is helpful to you.

(I owe Engadget Mobile for reminding me no-answer/busy transfer is also how YouMail works, and so is a workaround here.)

Update: Now that Google Voice doesn’t require an invite in the US, this article’s been getting hit more often. This review is rather old, and I’ve since used Google Voice for voicemail for about 6 months. Transcriptions are still just as ridiculous as they were a year ago, but it’s nice not having to deal with Verizon’s voicemail system.

I’d rather call a person back after getting a voicemail than go through the “press 1, then 9, then 83*” gauntlet created by my cell carrier.

Then I found YouMail. It turns missed calls & voicemails into emails with caller info & MP3 attachments of the audio. YouMail’s one step beyond “visual voicemail” to “cross-platform visual voicemail.” (With it I can check voicemail from any PC, in addition to phone.)

After receiving an invite to Google Voice, which I figured would trample YouMail on the road to unified personal communications, I thought I’d take a look.

Bottom line, Google Voice won’t get me away from YouMail just yet:

1. Google Voice requires a new phone number. Remember when cell providers wouldn’t let you keep your number? Well, this is worse than that. Your old number must still be active, but if people call it, no Google Voice lovin’ for you… hello, carrier voicemail gauntlet.

   Why would your well-meaning family on Verizon want to call your Google Voice number, and burn minutes, when they could call your (still very much active) Verizon number for free? Why pay attention to your new voicemail message pleading them to redial, when waiting for the beep’s not that hard?

   Google’s working on number portability, but I suspect this will still be a mess come fall.

   YouMail uses your existing number and only your existing number. (Techno-geek note: YouMail users your carrier’s missed-call forwarding to pull this off. I think there’s no technical reason Google couldn’t do the same for the slice of the Google Voice service I’m using… they just haven’t.)

2. Google Voice does email, but it doesn’t include an MP3 file containing the audio. This means one extra step (leaving the email app to go to the Google Voice website), and there’s temptation to manage messages once you get there (which has no effect on the original email in your inbox.)

   YouMail includes an MP3 in emails. Open the email, listen to the attachment, archive (or don’t), and be done. I like the pure email interface better, and the attachment is good.

3. Conversion of voicemail to writing is free, but that’s free as in “free VCR!”. Google Voice converts every voicemail into writing (“transcription”) for free, but like YouMail’s transcription (which isn’t free), it still doesn’t work well enough: you still have to listen to the audio to understand the most interesting parts, and very often the whole gist, of messages.

   No, it never saves you in meetings when you can’t put the phone to your ear. Instead, you graduate from degenerate who reaches into his pants suddenly, to uber-degenerate who reaches into his pants suddenly, whips out a phone, taps at it, and occasionally snickers, because computer voice translators are occasionally great at Mad Libs.

What’s great about Google Voice for the personal voicemail scenario?

1. Great, Gmail-esque web interface. Due to the MP3 limitation, you’d better hope the web interface is great, and it is. It takes some design cues from Gmail, although it seems rougher. I suspect it will merge with Gmail in Google Wave eventually and roughness will be moot. YouMail just doesn’t have the golden touch here, although its web voicemail functions are the same.
2. The voice prompt interface is very well done. It uses keypad for interaction, and speaks quickly and clearly.

One more thing:

1. Google Voice defaults to kitchen-sink delivery of voicemails, including SMS text messages. I imagine Google’s plea to carriers went something like this: “We’ll set a default that keeps you rolling in per-message SMS dough; please don’t block VOIP for now.”

Turn it off under “Settings”:

Unrelated Note 1: Using Google Voice instead of Skype

I’m not a Skype user, because PCs are too chunky to replace mobile phones, and “unlimited data” is a joke… but Google Voice does seem to provide free VOIP within the US, and paid calling to other countries (rates here), and I imagine is very competitive with Skype.

When PC form factors get righted, anyway, I’ll be sure to try Google Voice for VOIP. I wonder if I’ll have any choice at that point.

Unrelated Note 2: Using Google Voice on the web

Google’s got an embeddable widget allowing for direct calls to your phone(s) through the web. This is pretty cool. You configure instances of the widget in a number of ways (for example, custom greeting) and then get an embed code:

With the routing capabilities of Google Voice, I imagine this being useful as a web-friendly front to a multi-phone reception, or even as a blog comment system without any phones? There might be some cool applications for this.

Unrelated Note 3: Does Microsoft do something better here?

I should mention that I use a Microsoft Exchange-based solution at work, which does as well as YouMail does for the voicemail scenario. Missed calls & voicemails at my work number end up in my Outlook inbox as audio files I can access from anywhere I need them.

Google Flu Trends is a fascinating example of data aggregation & correlation with a real-world impact

According to Google, they’re only counting “every person who searches for ‘flu’”, but what’s interesting is the that during the 2007-2008 flu seasons Google was able to accurately estimate current flu levels 1-2 weeks faster than the CDC. Today, the data is as follows:

But in counting searches, there’s a problem… not everyone wants to be counted:

A Google employee, Niniane Wang, demonstrated conclusively that a lot of the talk about "anonymized" logs is just pure B.S., and people like Greg Linden have shown that it’s possible to identify people even from aggregate data. So I think some of the Google apologists here are being a bit too partisan. But in this specific case, I think it’s perfectly legitimate (and even honorable) to mine the data in aggregate. – Joshua Allen

I wondered how data pulled out of Google’s front end (crawled web content, available to anyone) compares to what only Google can pull out of the back end (what users are search for, theoretically not available to everyone).

I wrote an Excel UDF to pull “estimated result count” from http://www.google.com/search?q= (Google’s search SOAP API is no longer supported for new users) to see how many blogs/Twitterers and other sites are saying “’I have the flu’ <State Name>” today, per capita.

A couple of the states Google sees more flu searches from came out on top:

• Ohio (1st, estimated 156000 webpages/11.5M population)
• Vermont (3rd, 21400/2.9M)
• Alabama (5th, 18900/4.6M)
• Maryland (8th, 16900/5.6M)

and the bottom:

• Kentucky (36th)
• West Virginia (38th)
• South Carolina (47th)

I’ve no conclusion here… other than Ohio really needs to drink plenty of fluids and get some rest, and something about “both ends.”

You can find out which states Google users are asking questions about the flu from at http://www.google.org/flutrends/

Here’s a definition for a Google personalized homepage section that allows basic embedding of a ProClarity Dashboard 6.1 view or group.

Figure 47: Add URL to the definition file under “Add Content”

The definition file goes on a publicly accessible webserver because Google retrieves it into a cache. Feel free to use http://www.waded.org/files/proclaritydashboard.xml if you want to experiment. Dashboard Server/PAS Server need only need be accessible to those who want to view dashboard views.

This definition needs work… it doesn’t provide any help for selecting a dashboard view/group. All dashboard elements have permalinks but you have to find it and paste it into the Google configuration manually. I’d think a simple thin interface for picking from the views/groups would be nice, but as far as I can tell it would be an out-of-body user experience, as Google only supports very primitive configuration properties. (The interface would have to be a popup window or not fit into Google’s model of having configuration on the “flip side” of the content item.)

Here’s the definition…

<?xml version=”1.0″ encoding=”UTF-8″ ?>
<Module>
<ModulePrefs
title=”ProClarity Dashboard” height=”200″
description=”Displays a view from ProClarity Dashboard 6.1″
author=”Wade Dorrell”
author_email=”wade@waded.org”
author_affiliation=”ProClarity”
author_location=”Boise, ID”
render_inline=”optional”
scrolling=”false”>
<MayRequire type=”browser” value=”ie” min_version=”6.0″/>
<MayRequire type=”platform” value=”windows”>This module uses ProClarity Dashboard Server to display OLAP views</MayRequire>
</ModulePrefs>
<UserPref name=”view”
display_name=”URL”
datatype=”string”
required=”true” />
<Content type=”html”>
<![CDATA[
<iframe src="__UP_view__" width="100%" height="100%"></iframe>
]]> </Content>
</Module>

Google Send-To-Phone is a Firefox extension that lets you capture text (you’ve selected on a webpage, or pasted into the interface) and send it via SMS to your phone. I use it for sending short romantic notes to myself, or more often for sending myself plain notes. (Like the word “bagmovil“.)