<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>waded.org &#187; search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waded.org/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waded.org</link>
	<description>Wade Dorrell’s tech &#38; arts blog from the Idaho high desert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Accidentally searching for inputs</title>
		<link>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waded.org/2009/09/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s amazing how search engines are wrapping some sites with a task-oriented interface that trumps the site’s own interface. The accident: I type “fedex.com” as “fedex.copm” into the Address bar by mistake, and hit Enter before I even see what I did. What happened: The search engine which handles the DNS lookup failure (bing.com on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It&#8217;s amazing how search engines are wrapping some sites with a task-oriented interface that trumps the site’s own interface. </p>
<p><strong>The accident: </strong>I type “<em>fedex.com</em>” as “<em>fedex.copm</em>” into the Address bar by mistake, and hit Enter before I even see what I did.</p>
<p><strong>What happened: </strong>The search engine which handles the DNS lookup failure (<em>bing.com</em> on my computer) provides a whole navigation layer on top of the “best match” (aka “most clicked”) result (which is <em>fedex.com, </em>obviously) including &quot;Track&quot;, but more importantly the input field I was going to look for when I got to FedEx, &quot;Track a package”:</p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Picture of Bing search result for fedex.copm" border="0" alt="Picture of Bing search result for fedex.copm" src="http://www.waded.org/wp-content/image12.png" width="510" height="298" /> </p>
<p>I see this, past in the tracking ID I had, and I’m done. Really slick.</p>
<p>I’ll call out Bing here once again: Bing’s fantastic &amp; you should use it as your default for this reason &amp; others.</p>
<p>Some thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do users really look beyond even the “Best Match” line and see &amp; use these tasks? I do, and it’s a huge timesaver.</li>
<li>Browsers will eventually (and I think in the case of Google Chrome, are) strip even the search page layer away. (Why not show the Track a package input field as an option when I type the&#160; &quot;fedex.cop…&quot; into the browser&#8217;s address bar?) Now, is it better for users that a browser do this, or the functionality stay in the resulting page?</li>
<li>If browser integration is better for users, what&#8217;s the existing or emerging standard for this that all browsers can implement?</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waded.org/2009/09/30/accidentally-searching-for-inputs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
